Projetos e benchmarks

Modelos medidos em hardware identificado no post, e sistemas construídos de ponta a ponta. Cada um diz onde rodou, como foi cronometrado e onde falha, e aponta para o repositório que reproduz os números.

Vai comparar detectores ou segmentadores por conta própria? O Guia de Métricas explica cada métrica que esses posts reportam, e Aprender cobre os fundamentos por baixo deles.

Edge
·15 min de leitura Intermediário Em inglês

3D Vehicle Detection on a Laptop iGPU

UrbanOmniDetect-2 draws a 3D box around every vehicle from one uncalibrated camera and places it on a top-down map of the road. On the Intel Iris Xe inside a 12th-gen laptop, quantized to INT8 with OpenVINO and with its final layer kept in float, the medium model runs at 33 ms per frame (30 fps), and its box corners stay within 0.4 px of the original model on two traffic cameras.

openvinoIntelSoftwareInnovatoredge-aiquantization
Ler →
Avaliação
·26 min de leitura Avançado Em inglês

How many good parts does it take to beat a System One AI model? Between one and sixteen, on VisA

System One models, the idea TypeSafe launched with Jev in September 2026, answer a question with a decision in a single pass. Jev-Omni, an open one, and the untouched Gemma 4 12B it was built from inspect all 2,162 VisA test images without seeing a good part. PatchCore, the standard industrial anomaly detector, is given k good parts per product: at 256 pixels it passes Jev-Omni at k = 8 and Gemma 4 at k = 16, at 512 pixels at k = 1 and k = 4. Also: the base model beats its System One fine-tune, and a day-0 demo on a lime line.

metricsbenchmark
Ler →
Edge
·13 min de leitura Avançado Em inglês

Marigold V2 at four bits: what quantizing a 20-billion-parameter depth model costs

Marigold V2 ships as a 17 GB inference job, but the released checkpoint is a rank-128 LoRA over a frozen 20.4 B backbone, so the backbone is swappable. Four configurations on one rented A40: going 4-bit costs 10% of the time and saves 65% of the memory, picking GGUF over bitsandbytes costs another 1.87x and saves nothing, and streaming the weights from host RAM costs 3.33x.

quantizationedge-aibenchmark
Ler →
Edge
·28 min de leitura Avançado Em inglês

Build a computer-vision plugin for OBS Studio, and measure what every frame costs

A step-by-step OBS Studio video filter in C++ on OpenVINO, split so the model swaps without touching the plumbing, and measured stage by stage: getting pixels off the GPU, where inference has to live so OBS never drops a frame, and what the trip from camera to virtual camera costs.

openvinoIntelSoftwareInnovatorsegmentationedge-ai
Ler →
Avaliação
·22 min de leitura Intermediário Em inglês

How to build a rep counter that does not count your rest

A step-by-step build of exercise repetition counting on MediaPipe pose landmarks, in the browser. Each design decision is settled with a measurement: why the joint angle comes from world landmarks, why the 1 euro filter beats an exponential moving average by 44 percent at a 100 ms lag budget, and why one threshold turns six push-ups into twenty.

mediapipe
Ler →
Modelos e detecção
·28 min de leitura Avançado Em inglês

Reproducing a published pupil-diameter model, and running it in the browser

An independent run of Shah et al.'s released PupilSense checkpoints over all 424,000 EyeDentify crops, then the whole thing converted to ONNX and put in a browser tab: what the quantisation costs, what the preprocessing port costs, where the compute goes, and what I would change to make it both cheaper and more trustworthy.

mediapipe
Ler →
Modelos e detecção
·26 min de leitura Avançado Em inglês

YOLO-NAS Strikes Back: Still the Fastest Detector on Hardware You Already Own

Quantized to INT8, YOLO-NAS-S runs at 201 FPS on a laptop CPU and gives up 0.4 AP on COCO for it, and it drops straight into Frigate. The model aged well; its tooling did not. Here is a clean reimplementation, measured across CPU, Intel iGPU and NVIDIA dGPU, and checked bit-for-bit against the original.

object-detectionyolo-nasedge-aiquantization
Ler →
Edge
·29 min de leitura Avançado Em inglês

RF-DETR vs YOLO-NAS: A Practical Benchmark for Edge Deployment: CPU, GPU, and Intel iGPU Compared

RF-DETR Nano vs YOLO-NAS-S on COCO across CPU, CUDA GPU, and Intel Iris Xe iGPU, across two resolutions, OpenVINO FP32/FP16/INT8, and a custom fine-tune, all under one consistent evaluation. RF-DETR wins accuracy; YOLO-NAS wins latency, efficiency, and INT8.

object-detectionopenvinoIntelSoftwareInnovatorquantization
Ler →
Modelos e detecção
·11 min de leitura Avançado Em inglês

CNN vs Transformer, quantized: YOLO26-seg and RF-DETR-Seg race for instance masks on an Intel iGPU

Two opposite small segmentation models, a 2026-era CNN and a DETR transformer, both quantized to INT8 with NNCF and run on a laptop Intel iGPU. YOLO26-seg's forward pass is ~7.4× faster; RF-DETR-Seg keeps its masks more faithful under INT8 on the CPU, and its fully-quantized mask head breaks on the iGPU. The whole shootout, numbers first.

segmentationopenvinoIntelSoftwareInnovatorquantization
Ler →